Case Studies

Industry scenarios

Anonymized CyberShield CPA · CVA · XDR completed POCs and industry programs. Customer names withheld. Not outcome guarantees.

Industries we serve

We describe programs by sector — not named customer logos — so competitive details stay private.

Anonymized completed POCs and industry programs. Customer names are withheld. Findings are what each program surfaced for that buyer — not outcome guarantees, certificates, or named-organization logos. ISO/SOC certificates are under process. Live platform write-ups: CPA · CVA · XDR.

Banking & InsuranceSovereign LLM Workbench

Financial Services — Compliance Policy Library

The situation

200+ policy PDFs across jurisdictions. New hires spent 2–4 hours locating authoritative answers. No citation trail for audit.

What we did

Bulk KB ingest, strict context-only RAG with retrieval guard, gap assessment exports, and EU AI Act governance API evidence packs.

  • Policy answer time — < 5 minPreviously: 2–4 hrs
  • Source citation — Every responsePreviously: Rare
  • Audit evidence — Automated packsPreviously: Manual
  • Cloud dependency — 0% (local)Previously: 100%
ManufacturingCyberShield

Mumbai manufacturing multinational — CPA · CVA · XDR POC

The situation

A Mumbai-based manufacturing group among India’s largest industrials needed one view of residual risk, lateral movement, and malware across hybrid plant and corporate IT. Active Directory ACLs, stale Group Policy, excessive endpoint privilege, weak ransomware protection, and open CSPM items were not in a single evidence spine.

What we did

Anonymized completed POC on CyberShield CPA + CVA with EMAIL-SEC and dark-web validation in the Threat Intel Hub (redacted operator view, not a full marketplace feed). ESPA found excessive privilege; BAS showed a sophisticated attack path. Complimentary XDR telemetry correlated lateral movement. CIP and SIP were shared with the existing remediation stack — not a named-product replacement.

  • Program — POC completed · CPA + CVA + XDRPreviously: Fragmented tools
  • Identity / ESPA — Excessive privilege evidencedPreviously: Open ACLs · stale GPO
  • BAS / ransomware path — Attack path identifiedPreviously: Unproven
  • Close-out — CIP / SIP to remediation stackPreviously: Ad hoc
MSSPCyberShield

Pune MSSP — CPA + CVA after a completed VAPT

The situation

An MSSP in Pune had already finished a third-party VAPT and still needed continuous posture across ESPM, Active Directory, OS, platform, and database layers. Vulnerable endpoints and benchmark gaps remained invisible to the vertical head.

What we did

Anonymized completed POC: CVA and CPA including ESPM. CVA in a development environment still found open critical, high, and medium risks after the prior VAPT. Results were shared with the vertical head for immediate action. Customer name withheld; not an outcome guarantee for other estates.

  • Program — POC completed · CPA + CVA · ESPMPreviously: Point VAPT
  • AD / benchmark — Issues evidencedPreviously: Hardening gaps
  • Residual findings — Critical / high / medium still openPreviously: Assumed closed
  • Escalation — Vertical head actionPreviously: Delayed
BFSICyberShield

Mumbai capital-markets firm — multi-module CPA + CVA POC

The situation

A large Indian capital-markets firm needed the Group CIO and CISO to evaluate continuous assessment across vulnerability, configuration, pentest, CIP, SIP, patch, BAS, DbSPM, ASPM, ESPA, ISPA, and CSPM — then extend the program to additional entities.

What we did

Anonymized completed POC of CyberShield CPA + CVA spanning those modules. Leadership engaged for additional entities. Complimentary XDR remains posture-tied telemetry, not a SOC-glass replacement. Names withheld; not an ISO or SOC certificate.

  • Program — POC completed · CPA + CVAPreviously: Module silos
  • Coverage — VA · CA · PT · CIP/SIP · BAS · DbSPM · ASPM · ESPA · ISPA · CSPMPreviously: Partial
  • Leadership — Multi-entity engagementPreviously: Evaluation
  • XDR — Complimentary sensor optionPreviously: Separate stack
Manufacturing / BFSICyberShield

Enterprise CISO — Continuous GRC Program

The situation

No single view of risk → control → remediation. Fire drills before every ISO recertification. Evidence scattered across 12 tools.

What we did

CyberShield unified posture dashboard, policy lifecycle management, connector sync, and board-ready export packs.

  • Audit prep time — -40%Previously: Baseline
  • Control adherence — ≥95%Previously: Variable
  • Evidence tools — 1 platformPreviously: 12
  • Board reporting — Real-timePreviously: Quarterly manual
HealthcareCyberShield

Hospital Network — HIPAA Continuous Compliance

The situation

HIPAA controls tracked in spreadsheets across 8 facilities. No unified evidence repository for annual audits.

What we did

CyberShield with HIPAA framework mapping, automated PHI policy testing, and connector-synced evidence.

  • Control visibility — UnifiedPreviously: Fragmented
  • PHI policy testing — AutomatedPreviously: Manual
  • Audit findings — 3/yearPreviously: 12/year
  • Evidence collection — ContinuousPreviously: 2 weeks
Enterprise TechnologyFFAI LLM Firewall

Enterprise AI Gateway — FFAI Firewall

The situation

Uncontrolled public LLM adoption across 2,000 employees. Prompt injection incidents, data leakage, no tamper-evident audit trail.

What we did

Federated AI Firewall as inline proxy with session risk scoring, dual-direction enforcement, WORM audit, and SIEM integration.

  • BRD criteria — 6/6 PassPreviously: 0/6
  • Evidence exports — CryptographicPreviously: None
  • Injection blocks — 340/monthPreviously: 0
  • PII leak incidents — 0Previously: 3/quarter
GovernmentGVT360

Central Ministry — DPDP Act Readiness

The situation

30 departments with no unified DPDP compliance view. PII in evidence artifacts stored without anonymization.

What we did

GVT360 with DPDP framework mapping, Presidio PII pipeline, consent registry, and executive compliance dashboard.

  • DPDP mapping — 100%Previously: 0%
  • PII in evidence — Auto-anonymizedPreviously: Uncontrolled
  • Department coverage — 30/30Previously: 0/30
  • Compliance score — 78% (tracked)Previously: Unknown
BFSIGVT360

NBFC — Multi-Framework GRC Consolidation

The situation

Simultaneous RBI, ISO 27001, and SOC 2 audits with duplicate control tracking in three separate systems.

What we did

GVT360 single control inventory with multi-framework overlay, gap heatmaps, and unified remediation tracker.

  • Control systems — 1Previously: 3
  • Duplicate effort — -60%Previously: High
  • Framework coverage — Unified overlayPreviously: Siloed
  • Audit cycle time — 3 monthsPreviously: 6 months
Financial AIAI Assurance Lab

Model Risk — AI Assurance Lab UAAF

The situation

No enterprise AI inventory. Manual spreadsheets for EU AI Act and ISO 42001 evidence. Board lacked trust index visibility.

What we did

8 system types registered, 6 assessment engines, UAAF 7-domain framework, and board dashboard with certification tiers.

  • Systems registered — ≥90% in 90dPreviously: < 20%
  • Quarterly assessments — Policy-drivenPreviously: Ad-hoc
  • Framework mapping — ≥80% high-riskPreviously: < 50%
  • Certification decision — < 10 daysPreviously: Weeks
Law EnforcementCybercrime Investigation Platform

State Cyber Cell — Deepfake Investigation

The situation

Rising AI-generated voice fraud targeting citizens. Officers lacked court-defensible multimedia analysis tools.

What we did

India-ready forensic platform with audio comparison, GAN face detection, chain-of-custody vault, and unified case timelines.

  • Voice clone detection — AutomatedPreviously: Manual
  • Case documentation — Unified timelinePreviously: Fragmented
  • Court acceptance — ImprovingPreviously: Low
  • Cases processed — 45/monthPreviously: 12/month
TechnologyRedLabs

SaaS Company — Pre-Launch LLM Red Team

The situation

Customer-facing LLM chatbot launching in 6 weeks. No adversarial testing performed.

What we did

RedLabs continuous campaign with prompt injection, jailbreak, and data exfiltration probes with HITL validation.

  • Vulnerabilities found — 47 (pre-launch)Previously: Unknown
  • Critical remediated — 12/12
  • Go-live certification — IssuedPreviously: Not issued
  • Retest schedule — MonthlyPreviously: None
TechnologyQA/QC Assessment Tool

Product Team — CI Quality Gates for 9 Platforms

The situation

9 platforms released monthly with inconsistent quality checks. Performance regressions discovered post-release.

What we did

QA/QC integrated into all platform CI pipelines with perf/E2E gates and heuristic failure detection.

  • Release gate coverage — 100%Previously: 30%
  • Post-release bugs — 2/releasePreviously: 8/release
  • Perf regressions caught — Pre-releasePreviously: Post-release
  • Release approval — Audited workflowPreviously: Informal
Managed ServicesPlatformOps Command Center

MSP — 40-Platform Fleet Command Center

The situation

MSP operating 40+ client platforms with no unified monitoring or documentation.

What we did

PlatformOps registry, SSH remote operations, health polling, and auto-generated architecture docs.

  • Platform visibility — Single dashboardPreviously: Fragmented
  • Health monitoring — Automated 24/7Previously: Manual
  • Architecture docs — Auto-generatedPreviously: Outdated
  • Remote ops time — 15 minPreviously: 2 hrs/incident